A KarmaScore report, as it is produced

Exemple SA does not exist. Its twenty-four answers are fixed in the code; the report below is recomputed on every view by the same engine that serves real assessments. This is what you get at the end of the questionnaire, with no account and no data sent anywhere.

Exemple SA · Industry & Energy · 10–49 employees · assessed on 20 September 2026

Overall score50.2out of 100Needs strengthening

19.8 points from the label (threshold 70)

Better than 70% reference SMEs in the Industry & Energy family — indicative comparison: the reference panel currently consists of simulated data, progressively replaced by the real results of pilot companies.

Self-declared score: it reflects your answers as of today. Taken again another day, it may move — that is normal. The flash audit stabilises it by verifying the answers against evidence.

The four dimensions

Technology54.2
weight 25% · +13.7 vs ref.
Compliance41.7
weight 25% · -4.5 vs ref.
Environment54.2
weight 30% · -0.8 vs ref.
Society50
weight 20% · +7 vs ref.

1 critical issue — not offset by the score

A decent overall score can coexist with a serious failing: these indicators touch legal obligations and stand at zero. They come before everything else, whatever your score.

AI Act applicability and classification Without an AI Act applicability review, your exposure is unknown — if the EU market is affected, the transparency obligations of Art. 50 have applied since 2 August 2026.

Your strong points

Hardware life cycle75/100
Data governance75/100
Basic IT security75/100

The score is fully decomposable: each of the 24 indicators contributes to the total according to the weight of its dimension. No black box.

Action plan — the 5 fastest gains

1. Responsible IT procurement+1.25 pts
Move from “Criterion applied to major purchases” to “Purchasing grid includes the environment”.
2. Low-footprint hosting+1.25 pts
Move from “Energy profile known for the main services” to “Renewable-energy hosting preferred and documented”.
3. AI Act applicability and classification+1.04 pts
Move from “Never examined” to “Aware of the risk categories, applicability not checked”.
4. Control over AI vendors+1.04 pts
Move from “Informal reputation check” to “Data location verified”.
5. Impact assessments (DPIA)+1.04 pts
Move from “Occasional analysis for major projects” to “Documented analysis for every high-risk processing activity”.

The written summary

Deterministic version of the report, written without artificial intelligence: it is the one served when the writing model is unavailable, or when the guardrail rejects its text.

Summary

With 50.2/100, Exemple SA sits 19.8 points below the threshold of 70 required for the Swiss Ethical AI Inside label (version α). The company does better than 70 % of 10 reference SMEs in the Industry & Energy family — an indicative comparison, as the reference panel is still synthetic.

Reading by dimension

T · Technology: 54.2/100 (weight 25 %), +13.7 points against the reference average of 40.5.
C · Compliance: 41.7/100 (weight 25 %), -4.5 points against the reference average of 46.2.
E · Environment: 54.2/100 (weight 30 %), -0.8 points against the reference average of 55.
S · Society: 50/100 (weight 20 %), +7 points against the reference average of 43.

Strengths

Hardware life cycle (E): 75/100.
Data governance (T): 75/100.
Basic IT security (T): 75/100.

Plan for the next 90 days

Priority 1 — Responsible IT procurement (E): move from “Criterion applied to major purchases” to “Purchasing grid includes the environment” (+1.25 points estimated).
Priority 2 — Low-footprint hosting (E): move from “Energy profile known for the main services” to “Renewable-energy hosting preferred and documented” (+1.25 points estimated).
Priority 3 — AI Act applicability and classification (C): move from “Never examined” to “Aware of the risk categories, applicability not checked” (+1.04 points estimated).
Priority 4 — Control over AI vendors (T): move from “Informal reputation check” to “Data location verified” (+1.04 points estimated).
Priority 5 — Impact assessments (DPIA) (C): move from “Occasional analysis for major projects” to “Documented analysis for every high-risk processing activity” (+1.04 points estimated).

Next step

The T · Technology dimension is the firmest support (54.2/100); the C · Compliance dimension (41.7/100) holds the most room for progress. A reassessment is recommended once the plan is implemented.

Exemple SA's answers

The twenty-four indicators, with the level chosen for each. Every level counts according to the weight of its dimension: the sum is the score.

T	Inventory of AI and digital systems	Inventory of the main tools
T	Explainability of automated decisions	Explanation possible for some tools
T	Basic IT security	Security policy enforced, backups tested, breaches logged
T	Data governance	Data owners and managed access rights
T	Human oversight	Human review of sensitive cases
T	Control over AI vendors	Informal reputation check
C	Record of processing activities	Checked whether the obligation applies; main processing activities listed
C	Informing data subjects	Adapted but incomplete policy
C	Impact assessments (DPIA)	Occasional analysis for major projects
C	AI Act applicability and classification	Never examined
C	Data subject rights	Point of contact identified
C	Staff training	Written charter distributed
E	Low-footprint hosting	Energy profile known for the main services
E	Measuring the digital footprint	First estimate produced
E	Hardware life cycle	Purchasing policy includes refurbished equipment, storage media wiped before disposal
E	Digital sobriety	Simple rules (mailboxes, archiving)
E	Responsible IT procurement	Criterion applied to major purchases
E	Reduction targets	Target set, tracked irregularly
S	Digital accessibility	Occasional fixes (contrast, alt text)
S	Bias prevention	Occasional check on one sensitive tool
S	Transparency about AI use	Notice on the main channels
S	Impact on jobs and skills	Occasional training on new tools
S	Inclusion and diversity	User feedback gathered occasionally
S	Avenues of recourse	Human contact available on request

Your report will look like this one, with your answers. It stays in your browser; you can receive it by email, print it, or come back to it later.

Get my KarmaScore Read the methodology